Nose-to-face width ratio

Nose-to-face width ratio compares the width across the nasal wings with cheekbone width. Higher values mean the nasal base occupies more of the facial width; lower values mean it occupies less.

Synthetic frontal portrait with Glowometry landmarks marking nose-to-face width ratio

0.28 ratio

Nose-to-face width ratio

nasal-base width divided by cheekbone width.

The marked points show where we measure nose-to-face width ratio.

What different ratios look like

Compare the examples on either side with the original portrait in the centre.

Baseline comparison

Compare the lower example, baseline and higher example from left to right. The nasal base is narrower relative to cheekbone width. The outer nasal wings are farther apart relative to the cheekbone width.

The nose within the cheekbone width

The same nasal base can appear relatively small within broad cheeks and more substantial within a narrow face. The space beside it changes even though the nose itself stays the same.

A high result may therefore come from a broad nasal base or a narrow facial outline. When the eyes and mouth also occupy large shares of the face, the whole central arrangement may look substantial within that outline. If only the nose has a high relative width, the contrast is more specific to the nasal base.

A narrow nose or broad cheeks

At a low ratio, inspect the nose beside the eye gap and mouth. A fine nasal base can look narrow against those neighbours as well as the cheeks. A moderate base within especially broad cheeks may keep familiar relationships with the eyes and lips while looking smaller in the face overall.

The reverse applies at a high ratio. If the base is broad against the cheeks and extends well beyond a modest eye gap, nasal breadth contributes strongly to its prominence. If the eyes and mouth are broad too, the result may describe generally large central features within a narrower face.

Nasal shape and neighbouring features

Nasal height determines how much vertical space accompanies the width. A broad base in a short nose creates a compact frontal shape. A broad base beneath a tall nasal region gives the nose more presence in both dimensions. Nose height-to-width distinguishes these shapes even when their nose-to-face ratios match.

The eye gap and mouth provide closer comparisons than the cheeks. A broad base between a wide eye gap and a wide mouth can continue their scale. The same base between close inner corners and a narrow mouth stands out more strongly because it extends beyond the nearby spans.

The outline below the cheeks can also affect the impression. Broad cheekbones above a narrow jaw place the face's maximum width beside the nose, making its base look relatively smaller. In a long, narrow face, a moderate nasal width may occupy more of the available space.

Changing the base alters several ratios at once. Widening it raises nose-to-face and nose-to-eye-gap values while lowering mouth-to-nose, if the other widths stay fixed. These results locate the contrast around a single feature rather than describing separate changes.

Nasal prominence and attractiveness

A broad nasal base can suit a face with similarly broad central features, while a finer base can create more contrast beneath wide eyes or above a wide mouth. Its effect depends on the surrounding spans and on nasal height. A low width ratio does not necessarily make the nose inconspicuous if the bridge is tall or the tip projects strongly.

Zheng and colleagues reported relationships involving nasal length, width and eye spacing that differed among their study groups. Torsello's selected models also departed from classical nasal canons.

Growth and variation in nasal width

Nasal breadth varies substantially across the populations described by Fang, Clapham and Chung. The distribution of a nose-to-face ratio depends on both nasal width and the cheekbone widths in the sample. A reference drawn from one group may consequently fit another group poorly.

During development, the nose and the surrounding face need not broaden at the same rate. Changes in either can move the ratio, while proportional growth can leave it stable. In a photograph, soft tissue contributes to both visible boundaries, and expression can temporarily widen the nasal wings. Use relaxed images at a consistent distance when comparing results.

The quarter-width reference

The 24–27% reference describes a nasal base occupying roughly a quarter of cheekbone width. It illustrates relative scale, but the research does not establish those endpoints as universal preference boundaries.

How we measure it

We divide the width across the outer nasal wings by cheekbone width.

  1. 1

    Measure across the outer edges of the nasal wings.

  2. 2

    Measure the widest span across the cheekbones.

  3. 3

    Divide nasal-base width by cheekbone width.

Getting a clear photograph

  • Use a straight-on portrait with the camera near eye height and the head upright.
  • Avoid close wide-angle selfies; perspective changes central features relative to the facial outline.
  • Close wide-angle selfies enlarge the central nose relative to the lateral cheek contours.
  • Smiling and nostril flare widen the nasal base.

Check the marked points

  • Confirm both nasal-wing and both cheekbone points lie on visible skin contours.
  • Check that the face is relaxed and not photographed at close range.
  • Retake if either cheek boundary is obscured by hair.

Measure your nose-to-face width ratio

Upload a front-facing photograph to see your result and review the marked points.

Sources

  1. 1
    Quantitative analysis of facial proportions and facial attractiveness among Asians and Caucasians

    Examines linked nose-length, nose-width and intercanthal proportions in images from a 5,500-face dataset. Relationships and modification results differed between groups.

  2. 2
    Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models

    Selected Italian female models departed from several classical eye, nose, mouth and vertical canons; their proportions are descriptive findings.

  3. 3
    A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions

    Documents population variation, particularly in forehead height, interocular distance and nasal width; it does not compare attractiveness.

  4. 4
    Craniofacial growth: a three-dimensional soft-tissue study from 6 years to adulthood

    Documents unequal growth of facial regions, including greater proportional growth of the lower third.

  5. 5
    Surface facial modelling and allometry in relation to sexual dimorphism

    Relates facial size to shape and sex-related morphology in young Central European adults; larger faces were more elongated.

  6. 6
    Glowometry front-view measurement protocol

    Explains how the measurement is calculated and which reference range is used.

  7. 7
    Reliability of measurements taken from facial photographs

    Documents the effect of photographic setup and landmark placement on facial measurements.

  8. 8
    Focal length affects depicted shape and perception of facial images

    Shows that camera focal length changes depicted facial shape, measured proportions and attractiveness ratings.

Back to Measurement Insights