Nose height-to-width ratio

Nose height-to-width ratio compares the distance from the nasal root to the nasal base with the width across the nasal wings. Higher values describe a more elongated shape; lower values describe a shorter or broader shape.

Synthetic frontal portrait with Glowometry landmarks marking nose height-to-width ratio

1.57 ratio

Nose height-to-width ratio

nose height divided by the width across its base.

The marked points show where we measure nose height-to-width ratio.

What different ratios look like

Compare the examples on either side with the original portrait in the centre.

Face A

Compare the lower example, baseline and higher example from left to right. The nasal base is broader relative to the vertical length of the nose. The nasal base is narrower relative to nose height. The measured values do not follow the lower-to-higher order; compare the numbers shown beneath the portraits.

Face B

Compare the lower example, baseline and higher example from left to right. The nasal base is broader relative to nose height. The nasal base is narrower relative to nose height. The measured values do not follow the lower-to-higher order; compare the numbers shown beneath the portraits.

The proportions of the frontal nose

A tall, wide nose can have the same height-to-width ratio as a short, narrow nose. Their shapes may be similar while their sizes within the face differ. Comparing nasal width with the cheeks and nasal height with the rest of the face helps place that shape in context.

The ratio rises when height increases relative to width. This can make the nose look long, slender or both, depending on which dimension contributes. A lower ratio can describe a short nose with moderate width or a broad nose with substantial height.

Separating height from width

Greater nasal-root-to-base height extends the nose vertically while leaving the base unchanged. If the middle third is also large, the nasal region occupies a substantial share of the face's height. The elongation is visible in the distance between the root and base.

A narrower base raises the ratio differently. The nasal region may remain ordinary in height while its lower span becomes finer. A low nose-to-face width alongside this high shape ratio makes reduced breadth a more plausible explanation than extra height.

At the low end, a wider base adds horizontal span, while a shorter nasal region reduces vertical extent. A wide mouth beneath a broad base may continue that breadth; a short nose above a long philtrum may leave the eyes and mouth far apart despite the compact nasal shape.

The surrounding central face

A tall, narrow nose between closely spaced eyes can reinforce vertical emphasis through the centre. Wider eye spacing and broader cheeks give the same nasal shape more room at its sides. Its height stays unchanged, but it sits within a wider arrangement of features.

The nasal base can also look different beside the mouth. A broad base above a narrow mouth becomes a prominent central span. Above a proportionately wide mouth, it forms part of a broader nose-mouth pair. Eye-gap width adds the corresponding comparison above the nose.

The philtrum affects how nasal height contributes to the full eye-to-lip distance. A taller nose followed by a short philtrum may place the upper lip at a similar level to a shorter nose followed by a long philtrum. Inspecting the junction at the nasal base shows where the height is distributed.

The eye-nose triangle describes the base's position beneath the outer eye corners. A shallow triangle may accompany a short nasal region, but wide eye span can also open the angle.

Nasal proportions and attractiveness

Narrowing the base can make a nose look finer, while shortening its height makes the nasal region more compact. These changes alter different relationships with the eyes and mouth. Matching a ratio from another face would not reproduce those relationships unless the surrounding features matched too.

Zheng and colleagues examined nasal length and width alongside inner-eye spacing and reported differences among their study groups. A slender nose within broad cheeks and a similarly proportioned nose filling much of a narrow face may have different visual prominence.

Growth and population variation

Nasal height and breadth change through development without necessarily growing in the same proportion. The eye region and lower face develop on their own schedules, so a changing nasal ratio also sits within a changing facial outline.

Adult facial size can be associated with shape differences, and nasal breadth varies across populations. Later soft-tissue changes can alter the visible outline as well, making comparable photographs useful when assessing change over time.

Comparing nasal indices

The 1.3–1.6 reference describes a nose taller than its base is wide. Some published nasal indices reverse the calculation and divide width by height, so higher values there describe broader proportions. Check the direction and landmarks before comparing a published value with this measurement.

Tip projection and bridge curvature are easier to assess in a side view.

How we measure it

We measure from the root of the nose between the eyes to its base, then divide by nasal-base width.

  1. 1

    Mark the nasal root between the eyes and the junction of the nose with the upper lip.

  2. 2

    Measure across the outer nasal wings.

  3. 3

    Divide nasal height by nasal-base width.

Getting a clear photograph

  • Use a straight-on portrait with the camera near eye height and the head upright.
  • Avoid close wide-angle selfies; perspective changes central features relative to the facial outline.
  • Looking up or down changes the visible height from the nasal root to the base.
  • Close wide-angle lenses enlarge the nasal base relative to height.

Check the marked points

  • Check the upper point at the nasal root between the eyes and the lower point where the nose meets the upper lip.
  • Place both nasal-wing points on the outer contour.
  • Retake at greater camera distance if the nasal base looks perspective-enlarged.

Measure your nose height-to-width ratio

Upload a front-facing photograph to see your result and review the marked points.

Sources

  1. 1
    Quantitative analysis of facial proportions and facial attractiveness among Asians and Caucasians

    Examines linked nose-length, nose-width and intercanthal proportions in images from a 5,500-face dataset. Relationships and modification results differed between groups.

  2. 2
    The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness

    Composite-face experiments show that the attractiveness of one region is influenced by the rest of an aligned face.

  3. 3
    Craniofacial growth: a three-dimensional soft-tissue study from 6 years to adulthood

    Documents unequal growth of facial regions, including greater proportional growth of the lower third.

  4. 4
    Surface facial modelling and allometry in relation to sexual dimorphism

    Relates facial size to shape and sex-related morphology in young Central European adults; larger faces were more elongated.

  5. 5
    A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions

    Documents population variation, particularly in forehead height, interocular distance and nasal width; it does not compare attractiveness.

  6. 6
    Glowometry front-view measurement protocol

    Explains how the measurement is calculated and which reference range is used.

  7. 7
    Reliability of measurements taken from facial photographs

    Documents the effect of photographic setup and landmark placement on facial measurements.

  8. 8
    Focal length affects depicted shape and perception of facial images

    Shows that camera focal length changes depicted facial shape, measured proportions and attractiveness ratings.

Back to Measurement Insights