Mouth-to-nose width ratio

Mouth-to-nose width ratio compares the distance between the mouth corners with the width across the nasal wings. At 1.5, the mouth is one and a half times as wide as the nasal base. Higher values mean a wider mouth relative to the nose; lower values mean a narrower one.

Front-facing synthetic portrait of a clean-shaven male model with lines marking mouth-corner width and nasal-base width

1.47 ratio

Mouth width compared with nose width

mouth-corner width divided by nasal-base width.

The lines mark the mouth corners and the outer edges of the nasal wings.

What different ratios look like

The first sequence varies nose width; the second varies mouth width on a different face. Each sequence runs from a lower ratio on the left to a higher ratio on the right. The final sequence shows another face with the original portrait in the centre.

Changing nose width · mouth held fixed

Look at the outer edges of the nasal wings while comparing the mouth corners. From left to right, the nasal base becomes narrower and the ratio rises. The mouth stays the same width; its apparent width relative to the nose changes.

Changing mouth width · nose held fixed

This sequence shows a subtler change on a different face. Look at how far the mouth corners extend beyond the nasal wings: a wider mouth raises the ratio while the nose is held fixed. The comparison concerns mouth width, not lip fullness.

Additional baseline comparison

Compare the lower example, baseline and higher example from left to right. The nasal base is broader relative to the mouth. The nasal base is slightly narrower relative to the mouth. Look at the outer nasal wings; the difference is subtle.

The mouth beneath the nasal base

The mouth usually extends beyond the nasal wings, broadening the centre of the face below the nose. When the spans are closer in width, that expansion becomes less noticeable and the nose can look more prominent beside the mouth.

Changing either feature changes the comparison. A narrower nose can make an unchanged mouth look wider, while a broader mouth can create the same increase in the ratio.

Mouth width and nasal breadth

A low ratio may reflect a broad nasal base above a mouth of ordinary width. If the mouth still occupies a substantial span beneath the pupils, the nose contributes more to the contrast. A modest nasal base above a narrow mouth creates a different arrangement: the oral span is small beside the feature above it.

At a high ratio, a wide mouth extends farther beyond the nose. A fine nasal base can also produce a high result without an unusually broad mouth. Comparing both features with the face helps distinguish a prominent mouth from a nose that is simply narrow.

Both spans can increase together while their ratio stays similar. The nose-mouth pair then occupies more of the centre, even though the local relationship between them is unchanged.

Width and visible fullness

A narrow mouth can remain prominent when the lips show substantial height. A wider mouth with little visible lip height may look more understated, despite reaching farther across the face. Mouth width and lip fullness therefore contribute differently to the appearance beneath the nose.

The shape within the lips matters too. A tall lower lip adds visible area below the mouth seam, while a defined Cupid's bow makes the upper border more distinct.

The philtrum separates the upper lip from the nasal base. A short interval groups the nose and mouth closely together; a longer interval leaves more skin between them. The same width contrast can consequently appear within a compact central region or across a more extended one.

The eye span and lower face

Mouth-to-pupil width helps assess whether the oral span is narrow beyond its comparison with the nose. If the mouth is narrow beneath the pupils as well, check whether pupil spacing is unusually broad. Widely spanning eyes can make an ordinary mouth look small beneath them.

Nose-to-face width adds the corresponding check for the nasal base. A high nasal fraction alongside a substantial mouth-to-pupil span points towards nasal breadth as the main contrast. A modest nasal fraction alongside a narrow oral span makes mouth width a more likely contributor.

The jaw and chin frame the mouth from below. A wide mouth above a broad chin continues the horizontal breadth, while the same mouth above a narrow chin creates more narrowing towards the bottom. This can change how expansive the mouth looks even when its relationship with the nose stays fixed.

The 1.5 reference and attractive samples

The traditional 1.5 relationship is a neoclassical proportional canon. It describes a mouth half again as wide as the nasal base, rather than an optimum established by comparing every nearby value.

Torsello and colleagues found mouth widths exceeding 150% of nasal width in their selected Italian female models. The professional Black-model study cited below reported a different central tendency.

Population variation is especially relevant to nasal breadth. Fang, Clapham and Chung documented differences across reference groups, so a single local ratio may represent a common arrangement in one sample and a less common one in another.

Growth, ageing and expression

Nasal and oral dimensions develop at different rates, allowing their width relationship to change as the face matures. In adulthood, mouth width and visible lip height can also change differently. Sforza and colleagues found reduced vermilion height relative to mouth width with age, so a wider-looking mouth may have less vertical fullness.

Changes in nasal width can offset changes in mouth width, leaving the ratio similar while the surrounding contours look different. Earlier photographs are most informative when the expression and camera distance are comparable.

Checking the resting widths

Smiling can widen the mouth and nasal base together. Use relaxed lips when comparing results, and place the mouth points at the corners where the lips meet. The nasal points belong on the outer wings rather than the nostril openings.

A close camera can make the nose appear larger relative to the mouth. Keep the camera distance consistent and face it straight on so both widths are seen from the same angle. Inspect the sides separately too: an uneven mouth or nasal outline can preserve the same total span.

How we measure it

We compare the width between the mouth corners with the width across the outer nasal wings. The measurement uses a front-facing photograph with the lips relaxed.

  1. 1

    Locate the two mouth corners, where the upper and lower lips meet. Measure across them—not across the fullest part of the lips.

  2. 2

    Locate the outer edges of the nasal wings. Measure across the base of the nose, rather than between the nostril openings.

  3. 3

    Divide mouth width by nose width. Because both widths come from the same image, the result is a proportion rather than a size in millimetres.

Getting a clear photograph

  • Smiling, pursing the lips, or an asymmetric expression moves the mouth corners.
  • A close-up selfie can make the nose look larger relative to the mouth. Use a consistent camera distance when comparing photographs.
  • Turning the head changes the apparent widths. Face the camera straight on, with both sides of the nose and mouth clearly visible.
  • Shadow, hair, or a hand can obscure the outer nasal wings or mouth corners.

Check the marked points

  • Confirm that both mouth-corner points sit at the visible lip junctions.
  • Confirm that the nasal points sit on the outer base rather than the nostril opening.
  • Retake the image if the lips are smiling, open, or visibly pursed.

Measure your mouth-to-nose width ratio

Upload a front-facing photograph to see your result and review the marked points.

Sources

  1. 1
    Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models

    Selected Italian female models departed from several classical eye, nose, mouth and vertical canons; their proportions are descriptive findings.

  2. 2
    Proportions of the aesthetic African-Caribbean face

    Reports an attractive-sample intercheilion-to-interalar ratio and population-specific intervals.

  3. 3
    A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions

    Documents population variation, particularly in forehead height, interocular distance and nasal width; it does not compare attractiveness.

  4. 4
    Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology

    Documents age-related changes in lip size and visible vermilion, including declining vermilion-height-to-mouth-width ratios with age.

  5. 5
    Craniofacial growth: a three-dimensional soft-tissue study from 6 years to adulthood

    Documents unequal growth of facial regions, including greater proportional growth of the lower third.

  6. 6
    Reliability of measurements taken from facial photographs

    Explains how photographic setup and landmark placement affect facial measurements.

Back to Measurement Insights