Lower-to-upper lip ratio

Lower-to-upper lip ratio compares the visible central height of the lower lip with that of the upper lip. At one, the heights are equal. Above one, the lower lip is taller; below one, the upper lip is taller.

Synthetic frontal portrait with Glowometry landmarks marking lower-to-upper lip ratio

1.59 ratio

Lower-to-upper lip ratio

visible lower-lip height divided by visible upper-lip height.

The marked points show where we measure lower-to-upper lip ratio.

What different ratios look like

Compare the examples on either side with the original portrait in the centre.

Baseline comparison

Compare the lower example, baseline and higher example from left to right. The lower lip is thinner vertically relative to the upper lip. The lower lip is fuller vertically relative to the upper lip.

Visible lip height

The coloured surface of the lips is called the vermilion. Its upper and lower borders enclose the measured heights on either side of the mouth seam. The skin between the nose and upper lip belongs to the philtrum and is outside this comparison.

The ratio describes how height is distributed, so equal thin lips and equal full lips can share a result. Looking at their combined height relative to mouth width shows whether the pair is full or slender before considering which lip contributes more.

The lip responsible for the contrast

A high ratio can come from a substantial lower lip beneath an appreciable upper lip. The mouth looks fuller below the seam while the upper lip retains a clear presence. A small upper-lip display can produce the same ratio beneath a more moderate lower lip, without adding fullness overall.

At a low ratio, a tall upper lip creates more visible area above the seam. A small lower lip can also lower the result, but the mouth may remain relatively thin. Inspect both heights before treating either direction as evidence of greater fullness.

If both lips become taller in the same proportion, their ratio remains stable while the mouth gains visible area.

Contour, width and projection

The upper lip's Cupid's bow can make its border distinct even with modest central height. Fullness towards the sides also changes the lip's area without an equivalent change at the centreline. Similar central ratios can consequently belong to different contours across the mouth.

Mouth width determines how that height is spread. A narrow mouth with tall lips concentrates the visible area, while the same heights across a wider mouth create a more elongated shape.

Forward projection adds another dimension. A lip can turn outward and expose more surface, or project in profile while showing modest frontal height. Visible vermilion height measures the surface presented to the camera rather than tissue volume.

The philtrum and chin around the lips

A full lower lip beneath a substantial upper lip can form a compact nose-mouth region when the philtrum is short. A high ratio caused by little upper-lip display beneath a long philtrum creates a different effect: more skin is visible above the mouth while the upper lip occupies less space.

The chin determines how much height remains below the lips. A tall chin can make the same lip pair look smaller within the lower face, while a short chin places more of the visible area around the mouth. Chin-to-philtrum and philtrum-share measurements help locate the lips within those surrounding intervals.

Nasal width supplies a nearby horizontal comparison. A narrow but full mouth can remain prominent beneath a broad nasal base. A wide mouth with thinner lips may extend far beyond the nose without looking equally full.

Lip-preference experiments

Popenko and colleagues varied lip area and upper-to-lower proportions in female facial images. A lower lip approximately twice the upper was preferred within their experiment, where total projected lip area was considered alongside the proportion.

Heidekrueger and colleagues used altered versions of one female face in a survey of 1,011 respondents across 35 countries. About 60% selected equal upper and lower proportions. The available alternatives differed from Popenko's experiment, as did the underlying faces and rating tasks.

The 1.5–1.8 reference describes a visibly taller lower lip. Neither experiment established this interval as a preferred range.

Changes in visible fullness

Sforza and colleagues documented increases in vermilion measures into adolescence, followed by declines in several measures with age. If upper and lower lip heights change proportionately, the ratio can remain similar while their total display decreases. If one changes more, the ratio shifts as well.

Changes in philtral definition can alter the impression around the upper lip without changing its measured height. Nunes and Bran found that reduced definition made the region above the mouth appear longer in edited portraits. This can make limited upper-lip display more noticeable alongside the same lower lip.

Use relaxed, gently closed lips for comparison. Pursing, smiling or separating them changes the displayed heights and may move the central seam.

How we measure it

We measure the height of each lip at the centre of the mouth and divide lower-lip height by upper-lip height.

  1. 1

    Mark the top edge of the upper lip, the closed-mouth seam and the bottom edge of the lower lip.

  2. 2

    Measure the height above and below the seam along the same central line.

  3. 3

    Divide lower-lip height by upper-lip height.

Getting a clear photograph

  • Use a straight-on portrait with the camera near eye height and the head upright.
  • Avoid close wide-angle selfies; perspective changes central features relative to the facial outline.
  • Pursing, smiling, dry lips and parted lips move the mouth centre and both visible lip borders.
  • Gloss and hard light can make one lip boundary difficult to locate.

Check the marked points

  • Place the mouth centre on the relaxed closed-mouth seam.
  • Confirm the upper and lower points mark the central outer visible lip borders.
  • Retake without a smile, pout or parted lips.

What can change the appearance?

Clinician-led lip augmentation

Temporary hyaluronic-acid filler can add volume to the upper or lower lip to change their relative fullness. Placement affects how far the lip projects and how much of its surface is visible.

The result depends on existing lip shape, dental support and movement. Discuss suitability and risks, including swelling, asymmetry and rare vascular complications, with a qualified clinician.

Measure your lower-to-upper lip ratio

Upload a front-facing photograph to see your result and review the marked points.

Sources

  1. 1
    A Quantitative Approach to Determining the Ideal Female Lip Aesthetic and Its Effect on Facial Attractiveness

    Tests projected lip area and upper-to-lower proportion in female face variants; a 1:2 relationship was preferred within that experiment.

  2. 2
    The current preferred female lip ratio

    1,011 respondents in 35 countries selected lip proportions on one female face; 60% selected equal upper and lower proportions. Different options were offered from the Popenko study.

  3. 3
    Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology

    Documents age-related changes in lip size and visible vermilion, including declining vermilion-height-to-mouth-width ratios with age.

  4. 4
    The Impact of the Philtrum on Facial Attractiveness, Perioral Proportions, and Perceptions of Facial Aging

    Manipulating philtral contour changed perceived upper-lip length, age and attractiveness without establishing an optimal measured length.

  5. 5
    Glowometry front-view measurement protocol

    Explains how the measurement is calculated and which reference range is used.

  6. 6
    Randomized evaluator-blinded study of two hyaluronic acid gels for lip enhancement

    Measures lip-fullness and global aesthetic improvement after clinician-administered filler.

  7. 7
    Reliability of measurements taken from facial photographs

    Documents the effect of photographic setup and landmark placement on facial measurements.

  8. 8
    Focal length affects depicted shape and perception of facial images

    Shows that camera focal length changes depicted facial shape, measured proportions and attractiveness ratings.

Back to Measurement Insights